I asked the Cardinal how three things he would want to change about the church:
(1) Involve formerly excluded people (homosexuals, divorcees, women)
(2) Make senior members of the church more forward-looking
(3) Improve the quality of the sermons
He gave the example that for point (3) many priests print out sermons they find online and just give those instead of writing their own. To be honest, I found it quite charming that even members of the church seem to sometimes take shortcuts. It's kind of like: "Reinhard can you send me this slide, I don't want to build it myself". Also the fact that a lot of priests know how to use the internet is promising to me.
Regarding point (1) I was somewhat offended when the Cardinal mentioned that not only the Western World has "those problems" (and with that meaning homosexuals and women), but also developing countries. I hope his phrasing is due to is imperfect English. I am not sure though.
Besides the content of his arguments I found it interesting that he very rarely evoked emotion or spirituality, but was very statesmen-like. The CEO of Mastercard or Christine Lagarde sounded pretty similar. A Catholic classmate was actually disappointed about the lack of faith-related messages. I, on the other hand, found the Cardinal fairly easy to follow and not too up-in-the-air.
Unintentionally the Cardinal actually got some laughs. When talking about the universal application of rules he said:
"We have to have celibacy everywhere. Imagine we don't have it in Africa for example. Then every priest would go there."
Interesting.
Especially at the end I felt rather uneasy though. He placed his hands on some students and blessed them murmuring Latin phrases. It is just so far away from the things we are exposed here. So far away from technology companies, so far away from search funds and so far away from financial modeling. I am amazed by the fact that a group oddly dressed up men who repeat certain phrases in Latin can have such power. A group of men that calls minorities "problems", that cannot have sex and that clearly does not promote gender equality in their organization.
Taking a picture he sat down next to me and we had a quick chat for five minutes. He asked about my studies and what I want to do afterwards. We also talked about the self-selection of people from strong socio-economic backgrounds at places like Stanford and how different this is from Germany. It was like talking to any German politician or business-man and not like talking to one of the most influential members of that add group describes above
.
A lot to think about.
Cheers + bis bald,
TIM
I attended the lecture last night at Stanford. I believe that Cardinal Marx didn't use the word "problem" as you interpreted it. He mostly likely meant "problem facing" instead of "problem with" minorities.
ReplyDeleteAs for gays and divorced Catholics, it appears that the opinions of Church Leaders are changing ever so slowly. The fact that Cardinal Marx says that doctrine can change (http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/cardinal-marx-doctrine-can-develop-change) is a pretty big step.
Regarding the lecture as a whole, I was a bit disappointed with the audience snoring and nodding off during the lecture (and I'm not talking about the clergy present). I'm also disappointed that no women were able to ask the Cardinal any questions. There were a lot of wasted opportunities to ask questions regarding the Church, the Church's assets, and the Church's role in the global economy. No one truly knows what the Church is worth.
You also ask why there wasn't any mention of spirituality in the lecture, but you wonder why someone making blessings in Latin would have so much power in the church. To understand the power of prayer, you need to have an open heart to God. I suggest you come to Memorial Church Sunday at 4:30p as Cardinal Marx will be presiding.